The NHS has agreed to look into issues about docs having to move names and addresses of suspected unlawful immigrants to the Dwelling Workplace.
It has launched a session on the coverage after stress from MPs however won’t instantly ban it as some need.
Well being bosses have been accused of ignoring proof migrants are being deterred from searching for medical assist for concern of deportation.
England’s principal well being watchdog stated it was a “critical danger” to public well being.
Medical doctors and affected person teams warned it was damaging belief within the well being service and breaching affected person confidentiality, in proof final month to the Well being Choose Committee.
‘Concern of deportation’
The committee was advised one closely pregnant lady had delayed seeing her GP for months – and a few individuals had been selecting to attend accident and emergency departments, the place they aren’t requited to present private particulars.
The coverage is a part of Theresa Could’s efforts, launched when she was Dwelling Secretary, to make it harder for unlawful migrants to arrange house within the UK.
The Dwelling Workplace final yr signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with NHS Digital to make docs hand over non-clinical particulars of sufferers, together with their final recognized tackle, date of delivery and NHS registration particulars to immigration officers.
Some eight,000 individuals have reportedly had their particulars handed to immigration officers on this method.
The federal government argues the info is non-clinical and on the decrease finish of confidentiality.
However Sarah Wollaston, who chairs the well being committee, wrote to NHS Digital final month to say the MoU had been signed with out correct session and needs to be halted instantly for a evaluation of confidentiality procedures.
The Tory MP advised NHS Digital chief government Sarah Wilkinson: “We now count on NHS Digital to take this chance to display that it takes its duties in respect of confidentiality severely by listening to the issues raised concerning the MoU and taking motion accordingly.
“If it doesn’t, we’ll count on to carry an extra proof session, the place you’ll be required to supply a really way more convincing case for the continued operation of this MoU than has been offered to date.”
NHS Digital is required by regulation to co-operate with the Dwelling Workplace however it retains the appropriate underneath the MoU to hunt extra details about requests for knowledge and switch them down if “not happy that request is within the public curiosity”.
Dr Wollaston stated in her letter: “We don’t imagine that NHS Digital has absolutely thought-about and appropriately taken account of the general public curiosity in sustaining a confidential medical service.”
Launching the session, the Division of Well being stated there was proof that “concern of deportation is a barrier to searching for care”.
But it surely added: “There’s at present nonetheless a lot much less proof concerning the influence of data-sharing preparations and particular data of these preparations on deterring undocumented immigrants from searching for healthcare and therapy.”
Consequently, it has requested Public Well being England to “undertake a evaluation inside two years of the influence on public well being and health-seeking behaviour arising from the disclosure of non-public knowledge in relation to the investigation of prison offences, together with immigration offences”.
Submissions to the evaluation needs to be despatched by 30 March.