Home / health / ‘Liver branding’ surgeon Simon Bramhall fined £10,000

‘Liver branding’ surgeon Simon Bramhall fined £10,000

Picture caption

Simon Bramhall was sentenced for 2 fees of assault after admitting branding his sufferers’ livers

A liver surgeon who branded his initials on the livers of two sufferers has been fined £10,000.

Simon Bramhall, 53, used an argon beam machine to jot down his initials on the organs of the anaesthetised sufferers in 2013 whereas working at Birmingham’s Queen Elizabeth Hospital.

Bramhall, of Tarrington, Herefordshire, admitted two counts of assault by beating at Birmingham Crown Courtroom.

He was additionally sentenced to a 12-month neighborhood order.


One of many victims, referred to in courtroom as Affected person A, obtained a donor organ in a life-saving operation carried out by Bramhall.

However the donor liver failed a few week later – for causes unconnected to its implantation – and one other surgeon noticed Bramhall’s initials “SB” branded on the organ.

of the 4cm-high branding was taken on a cell phone and Bramhall, who now works for the NHS in Herefordshire, later admitted marking Affected person A’s liver.

Bramhall, 53, resigned from his job on the hospital in 2014.

The marketing consultant pleaded responsible to 2 counts of assault by beating in December after prosecutors accepted his not responsible pleas to fees of assault occasioning precise bodily hurt.

Prosecutor Tony Badenoch QC stated one of many two victims was left feeling “violated” and suffered ongoing psychological hurt.

The courtroom heard the surgeon’s actions had been a “naive and foolhardy” try to alleviate rigidity within the working theatre throughout transplant operations in February and August 2013.

‘Skilled vanity’

Acknowledging that Bramhall’s actions had not brought about both affected person’s new liver to fail, Mr Badenoch stated: “This case is about his apply on two events, with out the consent of the affected person and for no scientific motive no matter, to burn his initials on to the floor of a newly-transplanted liver.”

A nurse who noticed the initialling questioned what had occurred and Bramhall was stated to have replied: “I do that.”

Choose Paul Farrer QC, who stated Bramhall would perform 120 hours of unpaid work, advised the defendant: “Each of the operations had been lengthy and tough.

“I settle for that on each events you had been drained and careworn and I settle for that this will likely have affected your judgment.

“This was conduct born vanity of such magnitude that it strayed into felony behaviour.

“What you probably did was an abuse of energy and a betrayal of belief that these sufferers had invested in you.

“I settle for that you simply did not intend or foresee something however essentially the most trivial of hurt can be brought about.”

Picture copyright

Picture caption

The hospital stated it needed to reassure Mr Bramhall’s sufferers

Birmingham’s Queen Elizabeth Hospital stated Mr Bramhall had made “a mistake”.

“We will reassure his sufferers that there was no influence in any respect on the standard of his scientific outcomes.”

قالب وردپرس

About James Peckham

Check Also

How lengthy are you going to stay?

Life expectancy is rising globally – folks born in 2016 will on common stay seven …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *